Search for: "GMBH" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 8:56 pm by Patent Docs
.; Sandoz International GmbH; Sandoz GmbH; Lek Pharmaceuticals, d.d. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:42 am by John Chierichella
  A succinct articulation of the rule can be found in Consortium HSG Technischer Service GmbH and GeBe Gebäude-und Betriebstechnik GmbH Südwest Co., Management KG, B-292699.6, June 24, 2004, 2004 CPD ¶ 134 (upholding award to a joint venture even though the ownership of one member of the joint venture changed): [T]he record shows only that the corporate shares of SGM changed hands. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
Valckenberg, GmbH, 122 U.S.P.Q. 334 (TTAB 1959). [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post By: Paul Dietze and Mini Kapoor, Haynes and Boone, LLP[1]  On March 18, 2016, the Federal Circuit held that Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:26 am by Chloe Rogers and Sally-Ann Underhill
The recently decided case of SBT STAR BULK & TANKERS (GERMANY) GMBH & CO KG V COSMOTRADE SA (THE “WEHR TRAVE”) [2016] EWHC 583 (Comm) in the Queen’s Bench Division of the Commercial Court and before The Hon Sir Bernard Eder will, perhaps, come as a surprise. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:55 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - Trademark lawyers for Plaintiff Netzsch Premier Technologies, LLC of Exton, Pennsylvania ("Netzsch") filed a trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana against Defendants Pühler Feinmahltechnik GmbH a/k/a Pühler (Guangdong) Smart Nano Technology Co., Ltd. a/k/a Pühler (Guangzhou) Machinery and Equipment Co., Ltd. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:48 am by Kenan Farrell
PHLER FEINMAHLTECHNIK GMBH et al Court Case Number: 1:16-cv-00781-WTL-MPBFile Date: Friday, April 8, 2016Plaintiff: NETZSCH PREMIER TECHNOLOGIES, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Jeffrey Kose, Patrick F.X. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
BEWATEC Kommunikationstechnik GmbH, 2016 FC 223, where the Federal Court had to consider a non-use cancellation action filed against a software vendor’s registration of its trademark registered in relation to goods and not for services. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:55 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Readers who did not go through the previous post as this post refers to several aspects of the previous post.Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 12:52 pm by Karel Frielink
This case involved the question of the liability of a managing director (a Dutch person domiciled in Monaco) of a Swiss company (My Guide Holding GmbH) which was the corporate managing director of the bankrupt Dutch company My Guide (Nederland) BV. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Mylan Laboratories Ltd. et al. 1:15-cv-00185; filed October 19, 2015 in the Northern District of West Virginia • Plaintiffs: Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC; Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GMBH... [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 AbbVie also argued that since Arrow was decided nine years ago, the appellate courts have been more willing to permit EPO procedures to take their course without English judicial interference (see  Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2013] UK SC 46; [2014] A.C. 160, as summarised by Floyd LJ in IPcom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1496; [2014] R.P.C. 12.)Carr J rejected these arguments, holding… [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:15 am by Jani Ihalainen
The CJEU has been slated to answer the question of third-party liability for those who provide free WiFi in the case of copyright infringement, and awaiting that the opinion of Advocate General Szpunar has given their answer as to this highly important question.The case of Tobias McFadden v Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH deals with Tobias McFadden, who owned a business selling and renting lighting and sound systems for various events, and offered free WiFi… [read post]