Search for: "GORDON v GORDON" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  They include Annette Gordon-Reed and Peter S. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
United States (University of Washington Press) by Gordon K. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:37 pm
McKercher LLP.The rule came about as a result of the top court’s landmark 2002 decision in R v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:06 am
District Judge Gordon Quist issued a narrow ruling determining that homeless people do not "reside" in emergency shelters if they only go there at night to sleep and have no guarantee of a place to stay on any given night. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:14 pm by Venkat
This is one of a long line of losses by plaintiffs who seem to have made it a part of their business to seek out and sue people to send them unsolicited email (see Gordon v Virtumundo, Mummagraphics, etc.). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Jody Coultas
The Eleventh Circuit agreed with that conclusion based on the plain language of the licensing agreement and affirmed the lower court’s decision (Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am by David Yucht
Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case to the trial court to allow it to reconsider this award (4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Robert Margolis
The court also affirmed a district judge’s order sanctioning L&L for failing to disclose its third-party license agreement in discovery (Beach Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
An award of over $212,000 in nontaxable costs for expert witness expenses was, however, vacated, because there was no statutory basis for awarding those costs (San Diego Comic Convention v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am by Blair Albom
In addition, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying ACT’s request for a permanent injunction because ACT failed to establish that it would sustain irreparable harm (ACT 898 Products, Inc. v. [read post]
Accordingly, the appellate court vacated the preliminary injunction to the extent that it enjoined the sale of products that the mark owner chose not to buy back, and it remanded the case for reexamination of which product lines were covered by the injunction (Really Good Stuff, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:02 am by Staci Zaretsky
Quist, Judge Gordon Quist, Kent Beattie, Labor Statistics, Lateral Hiring, Lateral Moves, Laterals, Law School Lawsuits, Law School Litigation, Law Schools, MacDonald v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:41 am by Michael Scutt
  The case of Keane v Investigo & others UKEAT/0389/09/SM, commented upon by Gordon Turner and Damian McCarthy in ELA Briefing last month[1], held that a claimant has to prove a genuine interest in performing the job advertised. [read post]