Search for: "Harms v. United States of America"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 6:57 am
In United States of America v Quest Diagnostics, Inc, the Second Circuit found that the former general counsel of a diagnostic lab violated his ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct by his participation in a qui tam action under the federal False Claims Act (FCA) based on allegations his former employer’s pricing structure perpetrated a fraud against the Medicare and Medicaid programs. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:50 am
Takeda, in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a defamation claim based on res judicata grounds. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Eckert was asked if he had any weapons or anything else that might harm me which he stated "no". 7. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
of America v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In Cal Fed v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:41 am
Getting back on track after the government shutdown, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is now looking forward to defining its strategy for the next four years. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
In any event, argues the United States, habeas is an inappropriate mechanism for attacking such conditions. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 11:55 pm
United States, and this time Holmes dissented. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm
” Of these two harms, the one most obviously applicable to Town of Greece v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In University of Colorado v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Vanessa Absher, Lynda Mitchell and United States of America v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:34 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In Seaton v. [read post]
