Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
Morgan Stanley’s policies and procedures were not reasonable, however, for two internal web applications or “portals” that allowed its employees to access customers’ confidential account information. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
The horror comes not merely from the subject of the listing but from its banality, the reduction of its components to ritualized actions whose principle interest in in its aggregation ("In Italia seicento e quaranta; In Alemagna duecento e trentuna; Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna; Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre"), without regard to rank, value or societal impact ("E v'han donne d'ogni grado, D'ogni forma, d'ogni età"), and in… [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:37 pm
The case of King v Burwell had reached the US Supreme Court because of the phrase "exchanges established by the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Amnesty International USA, supra).Khan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:47 pm
”8 The concept can be used to describe the fact that fragmentation into an increasing number of international regimes with overlapping areas of competence can lead to contradictory decisions or mutual obstruction. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:56 pm
The Supreme Court embraced the theory for the first time in a 1971 employment case called Griggs v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
(1) A covered entity may use or disclose protected health information to the extent that such use or disclosure is required by law and the use or disclosure complies with and is limited to the relevant requirements of such law. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
” Webb at 21 (internal citation omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:00 pm
Mammon v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:31 am
Strengthening international norms through robust enforcement is an area in which the US can generate significa [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:23 pm
You can read all about that here, in the Brooklyn Journal of International Law.Along comes Chemtall, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:28 am
Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:00 am
Canada’s privacy commissioner calls for public input https://t.co/F0QrIueQzI -> Do customers really consent to how you use their data? [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:59 am
[internal punctuation omitted] The court says that “a consumer’s belief that Jerk.com had many users or that an acquaintance made his or her profile page would influence that consumer’s decision to use Jerk.com or purchase a membership. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:38 am
Martin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
On this particular question, the Chief Justice’s judgement in Grant v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
Both appear to be the product of careful forethought and custom tailoring. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
Both appear to be the product of careful forethought and custom tailoring. [read post]
