Search for: "INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC)"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 7:14 pm
International Trade Commission sided with photography pioneer Eastman Kodak in its patent-infringement battle with smartphone giants Apple and Research in Motion. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:26 pm
The International Trade Commission said it launched an investigation of Research In Motion and Apple smartphones that contain digital cameras after receiving a complaint from Eastman Kodak Co. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:22 am
International Trade Commission, found that Apple didn’t violate a range of Nokia patents. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 3:25 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said it dismissed the appeal because it lacked jurisdiction over the June 21 order by the International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
Nintendo has prevailed in a patent infringement case at the International Trade Commission, which determined that Nintendo's DSi and 3DS portables do not infringe on microprocessor patents held by three holding companies. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm
Further to our May 11, 2011 post, on May 13, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its Opinion affirming-in-part, modifying-in-part, and reversing-in-part ALJ Robert K. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:17 am
International Trade Commission (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:09 pm
Further to our June 27, 2011 post, on July 22, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion affirming, on modified grounds, ALJ Carl C. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:15 am
International Trade Commission and in the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:37 pm
On August 24, 2009, the International Trade Commission issued a notice determining to review in part the April 10, 2009 final Initial Determination ("ID") issued by ALJ Charles E. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:38 pm
Hess adds experience litigating before the International Trade Commission and handling Section 337 Investigations. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:51 pm
Further to our January 27, 2011 post, on February 17, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion affirming-in-part and reversing-in-part ALJ Robert K. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:46 am
On December 23, 2009, the International Trade Commission issued a notice determining not to review ALJ Charles E. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:48 am
The extent to which this has already happened is remarkable:In February, Apple told the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) that companies like Samsung couldn't make "like" articles to replace the iPhone (in the event of a U.S. import ban) since their phones won't come with iOS. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 10:45 pm
One day after the United States International Trade Commission ("USITC" or just "ITC") instituted three investigations further to Ericsson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:58 pm
Congress is not likely to vote on the TPP implementing legislation (aka ratification) until after the International Trade Commission (ITC) comes out with its report about the agreement's economic impacts in mid-May. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:55 pm
International trade Commission upheld a preliminary ruling on Monday that found Kodak’s patent claims to be invalid, but Kodak put on a brave face and said it would appeal that ruling with the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm
An administrative law judge (ALJ) with the International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an initial ruling late on Friday, saying that Motorola did not violate three of Apple's smartphone patents. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm
As detailed in our April 21, 2009 post, in the original decision, the panel remanded the case back to the International Trade Commission to consider one of Princo’s patent misuse defenses. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:14 pm
On September 14, 2009, the International Trade Commission issued a notice determining to review in part ALJ Bullock's June 29, 2009 initial determination ("ID") finding no violation of Section 337 in this investigation by Respondents Phicom Corp., Phiam Corp., Micronics Japan Co., Ltd., and MJC Electronics Corp. [read post]
