Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 5:58 am
Although it may be true that when they initially got the standard word mark of ‘POM’ it had no meaning at the time. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:15 am
“They are not succeeding — their initial petition was rejected by the court, and their second petition was eviscerated to a narrow and contingent order about an alleged recording pending CMP’s opportunity to respond,” the group said. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Chief Justice Roberts noted that the petition for certiorari raised three questions: (1) Does the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause apply to both real and personal property, and the court, beginning with a reference to Magna Carta held that it does; (2) was the reserve requirement imposed by the Raisin Administrative Committee a “clear physical taking”, and the Court ruled that it was; and (3), whether a governmental mandate to relinquish specific identifiable… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
(740 ILCS 5/2 rep.) [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:58 am
The court granted Hallmark's special exceptions and required Chambers to re-plead his case. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
If, on the other hand, the plan is "self-insured" (that is, if the employer itself is ordinarily responsible for payments), the Department of Labor would then inform the plan's third-party administrator (if any) that it is now obliged to offer contraceptive coverage--initially from its own resources--to the organization's employees (and/or students) without imposing any cost-sharing requirements on the eligible organization, its insurance plan, or its employee… [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:22 am
“They’re full-service operations,” said Straayer. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
It may be that a decent prosecutor could get a petit jury to convict a eunuch of rape. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:22 am
(2) Notice and Service. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:10 am
In re Driven Innovations, Inc., Serial No. 77073701 (June 30, 2015) [precedential].Clear Error: Section109.08 of the TMEP provides that, in examining a Statement of Use, an Examining Attorney "should not make a requirement or refusal concerning matters that could or should have been raised during initial examination, unless the failure to do so in initial examination constitutes a clear error, i.e., would result in issuance of a registration in violation of the Act or… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
§ 4B1.2(a)(2). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:09 am
If you're outside the U.S., sign our petition in support of open access and contact your representatives to make this initiative a priority. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-11-00757-CV, 443 SW3d 196, 06-27-13) The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. - consolidated with - No. 14-0109 IN RE ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-11-00757-CV; 13-12-00023-CV, 443 SW3d 196, 06-27-13) The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:20 am
They could do so by re-nominating and re-confirming the military judges to be CMCR judges. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Public rights adjudication was initially tied to waivers of the federal government's sovereign immunity, but has evolved to encompass additional claims related to, but not directly arising out of, such waivers. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
And since there is no greater longshot than a cert. petition, this should be a good week for relists. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
However, as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board had received nearly 3,000 applications since the procedure came into effect in September 2012, it was now clamping down on the initiation of claims (particularly on the grounds of obviousness) and follow-on petitions. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Chatman, 14-8589, involves a fairly thorny habeas procedural issue that, if you’re a real sucker for that sort of thing, you can read more about on your own d**n time. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
Brack requested the suspension of his prosecution of the application in order to petition to cancel the prior ORANGECELLO registration, which petition was successful by default. [read post]
