Search for: "Matter of Complaint Against Smith" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion Laboratories, Inc v… [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
In a neat parallel, the former lead singer of The Smiths has recently said he is “uneasy” about the Prime Minister being a fan of the band. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:41 am by Adam Wagner
In a neat parallel, the former lead singer of The Smiths has recently said he is “uneasy” about the Prime Minister being a fan of the band. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm by Bexis
April 7, 2011), pretty much the same result ensued, after the plaintiff was forced to amend her complaint to identify who did and did not manufacture the metoclopramide she took. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
Smith Corp., 751 F.2d 1226, 1236 (Fed. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm by KC Johnson
After the failure of the university’s efforts to have the civil rights lawsuit against it dismissed, Duke has filed its lengthy factual response to the unindicted lacrosse players’ complaint. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
"Not only is the rule in Slater bizarre as a matter of common sense, but it's contrary to the Erie doctrine. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
Paradoxically, this new found uneasiness as to the propriety of the civil courts ruling on matters religious might be thought to reflect the growing secularisation of public life in the UK, with the judges drawn from an increasingly unChurched class who – in contrast to their church-going and religiously literate Victorian and Edwardian forbears – felt uncomfortable and unqualified to sit in judgment on religious matters. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC The Angry Mob blog has a post about “Latest PCC resolutions and adjudications” – noting the upholding of a complaint of harassment against the Scottish Daily Mail and a number of unsatisfactory late “resolutions” of complaints. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:31 am by Daniel Bell
Smith, the threshold “public concern requirement” of Connick v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm by David Lat
To be honest, though, even though this complaint is nicely drafted — clear, concise, and matter-of-fact — it’s not that juicy a read. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  Preemption is a matter of federal law overriding state law, so it’s logical to think that state judges may have a different perspective than federal ones. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:08 am by Daniel Bell
Guarnieri filed suit against the Borough of Duryea (and other defendants) under  42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:50 am by Marie Louise
Actavis (Kluwer Patent Blog) Valsartan – Norway: Valsartan case goes on appeal: Novartis v Actavis (The SPC Blog) Xeloda (Capecitabine) – US: Hoffmann-La Roche files patent infringement complaint against Accord following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
Allen and Rick Smith, another VECO executive, e-mails, various memoranda, and police reports. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:06 am by Ashby Jones
The players’ response they “decertified” the union and filed  this 52-page antitrust complaint against the league in Minnesota federal court. [read post]