Search for: "Newman v. Case"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Newman & Biddulph on Post-Sibelius Comparative Spending Power Law in the U.S., Canada, and Australia
13 Sep 2012, 8:44 am
Newman (University of Saskatchewan College of Law) & Michelle Biddulph (University of Saskatchewan College of Law) have posted Comparativist-Structural Approaches to Interpretation of the Post-Obamacare Spending Power (Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (JICL), Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 5:30 am
Last week the Federal Circuit decided the case of Santarus, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:47 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:47 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:35 am
Supreme Court cases. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
Interestingly, Judge Newman filed her own dissent. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:53 pm
In Bancorp v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:32 am
See Paperless Accounting v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:21 am
Finally, although expensive, a § 145 civil action can reset the entire record and remove all deference (see the recent Kappos v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
K-TEC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:53 am
See BMC Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:55 am
We therefore reverse the judgment in both cases and remand in both cases for further proceedings on the theory of induced infringement.Judge Newman's dissent began:This en banc court has split into two factions, neither of which resolves the issues of divided infringement. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:48 am
Judge Newman had her own take. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:59 pm
The facts of the cases are as follows. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
Paymentech, and at least implicitly overruling the 2008 case of Muniauction, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:15 am
The Akamai case actually consolidated two lower court decisions. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:42 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Akamai Tech. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
See EWP Corp. v. [read post]