Search for: "Olive v. Olive" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The decision of the Supreme Court to reinstate the injunction in the case of PJS v News Group Newspapers ([2016] UKSC 26) has, unsurprisingly, attracted widespread comment, both in press and on social media. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is the legacy of the brilliant Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Therefore, my attention was grabbed by the opinion of Lord Glennie sitting in the Outer House of the Court of Session in The Tartan Army Limited v Sett Gmbh, Oliver Reifler, Iain Emerson and Alba Football Fans Limited [2015] CSOH141, a trade mark infringement case. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
”)  Maybe plaintiff lawyers can always, like Oliver Twist, ask for more. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by Gabriel Houghton
Oliver Wendell Holmes’ opinion in Buck v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
– Katfriend Oliver Fairhurst (Lewis Silkin) brings a very readable explanation of the queries.Injunction available after claimed licence fees paid - PPL v JJPBGuestKat Rosie Burbidge discusses injunctions: should an injunction be granted when the licence fees which were the reason for a claim being issued have all been paid? [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Ariz. 1983) (upholding NCAA sanctions for recruiting violations and denying student-athletes’ constitutiona land antitrust claims); but see Oliver v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:10 am by Tim Epstein
Ariz. 1983) (upholding NCAA sanctions for recruiting violations and denying student-athletes’ constitutiona land antitrust claims); but see Oliver v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Ariz. 1983) (upholding NCAA sanctions for recruiting violations and denying student-athletes’ constitutiona land antitrust claims); but see Oliver v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:16 pm by Kevin
“Shouting fire in a crowded theater“ is a paraphrase of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in his analogy for speech or actions made for the principal purpose of creating panic in the US Supreme Court case of Schreck v US. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am by Kevin
" For an even more heroic attempt to ignore the statute of limitations, see Knights Templar v. [read post]