Search for: "Russell v. United States" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
United States (08-876) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether the “honest services” clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the ban on direct corporate campaign spending in the Federal Campaign Finance Act, and McCutcheon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision blocking the enforcement of key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-479 Title: Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
The case concerns allegations of war crimes by Mr Russell while on tour in Afghanistan. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:19 pm by Russell Knight
Most jurisdictions in the United States have the concept of “waiving service. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]