Search for: "SULLIVAN V. SULLIVAN" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court of Appeal Holds That Actual Notice Must Be Provided to Police Officer Within the 1-Year POBRA Statutory Timeframe
25 Nov 2014, 9:18 am by Morin Jacob
  In a footnote, it cites to Sullivan v. [read post]
California Public Agency Labor and Employment Blog - http://www.calpublicagencylaboremploymentblog.com
IP Conflicts — Soccer Trademark Spat + Whisky Glass Design Meets Bolkiah Principles Discussion
22 Oct 2019, 8:44 am by Dan Bressler
” And via Bill Freivogel, commentary on: Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
Bressler Risk Blog - http://www.bresslerriskblog.com
Brinker Meal Break Opinion Vacated
6 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
This court recommends the opinion not be published on the ground it does not yet meet the standards for publication.The separate letter said:Chief Justice George: In the matter of Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
Wage Law - http://www.californiawagelaw.com/wage_law/
Transcript & Coverage of Maples v. Thomas
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm by Steve Hall
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
StandDown Texas Project - http://standdown.typepad.com/weblog/
Third Circuit Vacates Nationwide Antitrust Settlement That Combined Indirect Purchaser Claims From All Fifty States
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am by Maxwell Kennerly
As The Legal Intelligencer put it: In its 75-page opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
Litigation and Trial - Max Kennerly - http://www.litigationandtrial.com/
Anan Kasei v Neo Chemicals – Court of Appeal clarifies “uncertainty” insufficiency and excessive breadth insufficiency
15 Oct 2019, 7:43 am by Brian Cordery
Floyd LJ revisited the leading cases of Biogen v Medeva [1997] and Generics v Lundbeck [2009] on breadth of claim insufficiency. [read post]
Kluwer Patent Blog - http://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/
Court Focuses on Representations in Agreements Filed with SEC
4 Jan 2009, 10:53 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memo by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.) [read post]
The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov
What’s In a Name? NY Court Comes Down Hard on Gnosis for its “Calculated Decision” to Use Improper Chemical Name to Describe a Product
5 Oct 2012, 7:07 am by Lisa Salazar
V. [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://fulbrightbrandprotection.blogspot.com/
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 6 today (and 10 NFP)
17 Jul 2007, 11:28 am
Kacak v. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
CA Appeals Court Remands Denial of Hotel Owners’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Over Taking Claim Under Minimum Stay Requirement
15 Nov 2018, 5:29 am by Patricia Salkin
This post was authored by Edward Sullivan, Esq. [read post]
Law of the Land - http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/
Allegations of Malice Must Be Plausible
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 280 (1964)). [read post]
Virginia Defamation Law Blog - http://www.virginiadefamationlawyer.com/
Untitled
29 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm by Jon Sands
  US v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/
In-Chambers Stare Decisis
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm by Mark Tushnet
Sullivan as deeply inconsistent with the original understanding of the First Amendment? [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
President's Day News & Notes (Supreme Court style)
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am by David Markus
Both Snyder v. [read post]
Southern District of Florida Blog - http://sdfla.blogspot.com/
Sullivan & Cromwell’s Mailroom of Death: A Law Firm’s Error Could Cost a Man His Life
3 Aug 2010, 1:43 pm by David Lat
We might see Maples v. [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Update: Graham v. Florida No. 08-7412:
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
Case is available at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-7412.pdf ------------------------- Sullivan v. [read post]
Criminal Law Library Blog - http://www.criminallawlibraryblog.com/
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1591, the term “commercial sex act” — defined as “any sex act, on account of which anything of value is given to or received by any person,” id. § 1591(e)(3) — doesn’t require that the “[]thing of value” have a monetary value; it can be something “intangible” that has a subjective value to the person receiving it. United States v. Raniere, Nos. 20-3520-cr(L), 20-3789-cr(Con), __ F.4th ____, 2022 WL 17543156 (2d Cir. Dec. 9, 2022) (C.J.J.’s Calabresi, Cabranes, and Sullivan).
14 Dec 2022, 8:46 am by Darrell Fields
United States v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
Convictions for “actual and attempted Hobbs Act robbery” are crimes of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). And the imposition of 6 consecutive mandatory minimum prison sentences, totaling 115 years’ (based on the “stacking” of five § 924(c) convictions, running consecutively to a 10-year minimum drug sentence), doesn’t violate the Eighth Amendment. United States v.  Waite, No. 18-2651, __F.4th__, 2021 WL 3870712 (2d Cir. Aug. 31, 2021) (C.J.J. Cabranes, Raggi, Sullivan).
8 Sep 2021, 1:08 pm by John Lee
United States v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
30 Apr 2017, 12:58 pm by Howard Friedman
Sullivan,(9th Cir., April 12, 2017), the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's RLUIPA complaint regarding restrictions on the wearing of dreadlocks.In Clark v. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/