Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 9:00 am
Sundquist. ** After examining for the twenty-first time — as it has at every Conference since September — a case on the role of federal appeals courts in state habeas cases, the Court once again took no action on Ryan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in on this again in R. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 3:04 pm
In one of them filed in the Southern District of California on November 6, 2015, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:28 am
Settlement agreementsMcLean v Village of Sleepy Hollow, 166 F. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 8:13 am
Coverage of the Baze v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
However, his lawyers have explicitly stated that he is selective in licensing his work. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:06 pm
Ever since Bush v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:28 am
The Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:11 am
In language that could well be a Sokol hoax on the vacuousness of post-modernist non-thinking, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued a press release to announce its judgment in N.W. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:46 pm
Bates set a Feb. 9 deadline for such a filing, issuing an order in Hamlily v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Smith didn’t get to spell out the full argument, so I’ll try. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
” Such language, it added, is absolutely essential, under the Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
As the Court recently held in People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
But it might nevertheless have a great impact: Should the Court of Justice eventually adopt his opinion, in the closely watched case of Schrems v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am
Take what I say with a grain of salt - I think Rite Hite v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
(Citing Desmond v. [read post]
