Search for: "State of Kansas v. United States"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Tokai v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 am
The published decision is Wintermute v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
"* See The Constitution of the United States of America, U.S.G.P.O., Page 1035, Footnote 2.** Cooper v Aaron, 358 US 1, 18-19, [1958]. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[27] The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:14 am
Dec. 22, 2010), is a decision from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas where the key issue was the applicability of the Kansas Structured Settlement Protection Act (the Kansas SSPA, Kansas Statutes §§ 40-461 to 40-467). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:31 pm
Dec. 22, 2010), the United States District Court for the District of Kansas issued an opinion rejecting a motion to reconsider the Court's October 1, 2010 decision on the question of whether the Kansas Structured Settlement Protection Act, Kansas Statutes §§ 40-461 to 40-467, applied in that case. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
The act was struck down by a conservative Supreme Court majority in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
United States, 642 F. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm
Wal-Mart, now pending before the United States Supreme Court, as it is the largest employment class action in history. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Among these states, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin expressly allow recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to statute. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989); United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm
United States, 597 F.Supp. 374, 412 (D. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:47 am
Notably, however, after initially accepting certification, the Kansas Supreme Court declined to review, stating that in light of the recent Kansas federal district court decision in Gerdes v. [read post]
