Search for: "State of New York v Robert V." Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Adam Liptak reports tor The New York Times that “[t]he chief justice has twice had seizures, in 1993 and 2007, but [the spokeswoman’s] statement said his latest fall had not been caused by one. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
New York and some free speech cases late in his career were deeply persuasive and ultimate [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[In the New York Times I explain that the Chief Justice Roberts we've seen this term is the same one we've seen before.] [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
See, e.g., the New York Times’s 1619 Project. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse suggests that “the chief justice means to leave the door open to abortion regulations that confer no medical benefit while imposing obstacles less drastic — perhaps less ‘substantial’ — than ridding a state of all but one abortion clinic. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 7:46 pm by Ilya Somin
On Thursday, the New York Court of Appeals (which is that state's highest court) issued a decision in National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At ABC News, Devin Dwyer reports that “[t]he administration makes the case in a legal brief filed Thursday in” California v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
New York) concerning the Commerce Secretary’s inclusion of a citizenship question on the census, in which the Supreme Court held that the stated justif [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Zeh has made a prima facie showing that, as a part-time misdemeanor public defender, he is not a public official under the standard of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that the ruling “preserv[es] a tool that has allowed [the SEC] to recover billions of dollars[, b]ut the justices said courts should place significant limits on what kinds of disgorgements are permissible. [read post]