Search for: "State v. Ball" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
Likewise, ISS has signaled that directors could or should be held personally accountable for cyber security breaches if they fail to keep their eye on the ball. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:44 pm
  That is why the district court was correct and the Sixth Circuit is wrong in Payne v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:51 am by David DePaolo
The fact that Judge Cueto even took an interest in workers' compensation is beyond extraordinary.And knowing that the only resolution of such a conflicting issue is an appeal to the Third Circuit or directly to the FL Supreme Court is pure judicial chutzpah.The basis for Judge Cueto's ruling is that over the years the Florida workers' compensation act's original grant of benefits for permanent disability, which was part of the "Grand Bargain," has been so eroded as to… [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:53 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, American Alternative Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm by SJM
Following Stec v UK and R (Carson) v SSWP, it was settled law that the allocation of state resources was a matter for Parliament and the government and not the Court. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the employees’ employment with the Controlled Group was “involuntarily terminated” when Anheuser-Busch sold Metal Container to Ball and they became Ball employees. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:31 pm
  The Argentinians will almost certainly try to spoil the German flow, and Ghana and the United States have proven that the Germans can be held or hobbled. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 1:39 pm by Jim Gerl
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
As the U.S. game opened, the German dominance evoked memories of the pithy law-school brief for the contracts chestnut Hadley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court continued its trend of significant decisions today, issuing rulings in favor of copyright holders over technological innovation (ABC v Aereo) and in favor of upholding privacy rights in the face of police searches (Riley v California). [read post]