Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 22,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2016, 9:53 am
In its ruling Tuesday, the court found the "statute unconstitutional because it creates an undue burden on a woman's access to abortion, violating protected rights under our federal Constitution, Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 4:05 am
In Mast v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:30 pm
In Carmichael v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:00 am
Friday, the Texas Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in the case of Environmental Processing Systems, L.C. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:05 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Supreme Court yesterday denied review in Sterling v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:33 am
Balboa.The military judge in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:37 am
State Farm v. [read post]
New Judgment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
26 Jul 2017, 2:39 am
To determine the initial criterion, the Supreme Court held that the burden of proof of establishing that the proposed marriage is one of convenience falls on the Secretary of State. [read post]
4 Mar 2005, 7:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Second, they can and should hold that no plaintiff can satisfy the “substantial burden” requirement of a RFRA by invoking what amounts to an attenuated, psychic burden like Hobby Lobby’s. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm
KIUC is charged with nine counts each of taking threatened species in violation of 16 USC §§ 1538(a)(1)(G) and 1540(b)(1) and Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, § 17.31(c) and (a); and taking migratory birds in violation of 16 USC §§ 703(a), 707(a).I haven't had time to do more than scan it and I'm no expert at environmental law - especially endangered species (we'll learn about it together as the case progresses) - but I notice that many of the… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 8:20 am
” As a result of the state’s ban that followed the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The opinion is Sorrell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 3:38 pm
Here, the petitioner was represented by counsel, and the state had to show that it met the burden of consent for statements. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:00 am
Lowery v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:05 am
In Schworck v. [read post]
