Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 10:42 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:41 pm
Today’s Iowa Supreme Court decision in Bertrand v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 12:13 am
The plaintiff/1st appellant therefore filed an action via originating summons in the Federal High Court, Lagos State Judicial Division, seeking declaratory reliefs to that effect. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:46 am
For that reason, I have welcomed rulings to allow these claims to be reviewed on appeal. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
At the time, then Judge O’Connor sat on the Arizona Court of Appeals after a term in a superior court and multiple terms in the Arizona Senate. [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:51 am
Supreme Court, Ricci v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
By Lisa Whittaker The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reverses district court’s summary judgment ruling in Yazdian v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
I asked Howard Skaist for his views on the recent decision in Ariad v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:49 pm
The stars seem to have aligned such that our state appellate courts as well the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:37 pm
DYFS v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, is the exceptional case. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 am
”A similar issue was considered by New York State's Court of Appeals in Longwood Cent. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
This ruling was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:54 am
Previously, we have blogged about the Gnall v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
PI then appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
The 5-4 division of the Court anticipated the better known, but even more divisive, views of the Justices in the Dred Scott case (1857). [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:53 am
The New Jersey Lawyer newspaper reported the case of State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Lackawanna next filed a CPLR Article 78 petition challenging the Deputy Comptroller’s decision.Citing Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873, the Appellate Division confirm the Deputy Comptroller’s ruling, explaining that “[i]n order for an incident to constitute an accident for purposes of the Retirement and Social Security Law, it must be "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact; and citing Matter… [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
§ 1404(a) cannot provide a basis for the transfer order in this case because the Court of Federal Claims is not a "district or division" under § 1404(a); 28 U.S.C. [read post]
