Search for: "State v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Lyft, Inc., a different district court in the District of Columbia reached the opposite conclusion. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
United States (1983); Employment Division v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
United States (1983); Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:34 am
The panel is Judges Kleinfeld, McKeown, and Fisher, not the panel I expected.The panel says, "Timing is everything and the district court should take the time necessary to address the State's newly revised protocol in accord with Supreme Court authority. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in the 1964 case of Reynolds v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:33 am
Banta v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:31 am
My colleague Roger Alford has a fascinating post over at the blog Opinio Juris (available  here)  detailing a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case of Bauman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:44 am
That’s what the UCC and the majority of the judicial foreclosure states say. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
We end the Ninth Circuit hit parade with Chappell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
United States 13-392Issue: (1) Whether, in the context of a First-Amendment-protected contribution to a judicial campaign, the McCormick v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
To the litigation industry, the prospect of judicial gatekeeping of expert witness testimony was an anathema. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 12:30 pm
And in a recent case—United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 12:30 pm
District court: How about three times that? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
Both the district court and the Ninth Circuit held that the CROA’s anti-waiver and disclosure provisions, when taken together, afford consumers a non-waivable right to sue in court, thus voiding the arbitration clause included in the CompuCredit cardholder agreement. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:57 am
The majority relied heavily upon a 1996 Supreme Court decision, Romer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court agreed, noting that every federal appeals court that had confronted the issue had agreed that there was a bar to judicial review at the initiative of a targeted violator. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
Liu's nomination to the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Barrack Obama was effectively blocked by Senate Republicans who criticized Mr. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
An interesting decision came down last week from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, Doe vs. [read post]
