Search for: "State v. Mar" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald &… [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
When is a transaction subject to the digital advertising tax “in the state”? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 10 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:12 pm by Elizabeth Rowe and Kevin Cloutier
Serv., LLC, Case No. 6:15-cv-2064 (Mar. 24, 2016) (rejecting conditional certification under FLSA); Kraft v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald &… [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Div. 2001) ("romantic relationships are not protected 'recreational activities'"); State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 28 January, the Supreme Court will hear the case of CPRE Kent v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
It should—except that the attack in question took place on Mar. 1, 1954, at the hands not of #MAGA extremists but of Puerto Rican independence radicals. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in the States, 68 Catholic University Law Review 629 (2020). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 20 and Thursday 21 January the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald &… [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am by Beth S. Lyons
  The answer, in my view, is “no,” based largely on Rwanda’s State interference with the ICTR. [read post]