Search for: "State v. Mart"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2012, 3:39 am
BURKS et al v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:45 pm
Merrill Lynch, Judge Posner distinguished the Supreme Court’s Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
E.g., San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
”); see also Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 11:04 am
A divided panel of the appellate court affirmed on July 11, 2011, finding the decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
See Clark v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:57 pm
Supreme Court ,Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 10:09 am
The state Supreme Court will decide which offer shifts costs when it resolves the split between Martinez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:50 am
Oct. 15, 2012), the plaintiffs were former members of the class decertified as a result of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 537 F. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm
His apparent feminist awakening didn’t happen in the decade that the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 2:07 pm
Interestingly, although the court did not cite the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 1:51 pm
In other words, the decision arising out of Casias v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:49 am
The answer is "yes", courtesy of the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in the seminal case of Casias v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.In theory, the 2008 enactment of the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (MMMA) provides a statutory right for patients and their caregivers to cultivate and use medical marijuana. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:52 am
EE Mart FC, LLC, 2010 U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:17 pm
In Berrington v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
In McReynolds, which was decided after the Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 1:16 pm
On October 2, three named plaintiffs filed a third lawsuit against Wal-Mart entitled Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
