Search for: "State v. Rowe" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The opinion suggests that the state all but conceded that this was the proper outcome of the case under Carey v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
Cain, yesterday’s summary reversal of a state court decision denying habeas relief to a death-row inmate; he contends that Wearry’s “is the kind of case that should not have been capital in the first place. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:51 pm
There was a lot of discussion around the applicability of Laird v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm by Christine Dowling
  The Kentucky Supreme Court's opinion can be accessed here (from the court's minutes, click on the link to the case Bowling v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
” At his Harmless Error blog, Luke Rioux discusses last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 7:22 am by Thomas P. Gulick
I was in attendance at the Supreme Court on Monday, November 8, 2010 for the hearing in the Costco v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
This article is Part V of a series of articles examining sentencing and plea bargaining in Texas. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:38 am by InhouseBlog
” Read: Legal industry gains jobs for third month in a row after a disastrous April at ABA Journal – Top Stories [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 5:24 am
Schaerr, representing California and 20 other states that entered the case, Smith v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
  1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:46 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:14 am
When it is known that the effects of the chemicalscould be reversed if the proper actions are taken,does substantive due process require a state to beprepared to maintain life in case a stay of executionis granted after the lethal injection chemicals areinjected? [read post]