Search for: "State v. Tech" Results 1021 - 1040 of 5,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2021, 7:00 am by Sandy Rokhlin
Lawsuit Update: Pokémon GOes Scot-Free Barbaro Tech., LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
He dogmatically denied the claims calling his confirmation hearing a “hi-tech lynching. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
And in the article, he states that the aggregate impact of marginal gains can be significant when they are compounded. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
Department of Justice Antitrust Division, it is likely we will see some important antitrust enforcement action from both agencies very soon aimed at corporate concentration, especially the big tech sector. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm by Unknown
Hansen (Religious Freedom; Free Exercise Clause) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlScudero v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
By Sarah McKibbin, University of Southern Queensland Epic Games, the developer of the highly popular and lucrative online video game Fortnite, recently won an appeal against tech juggernaut, Apple, in Australia’s Federal Court.[1] Fortnite is played by over three million Apple iOS users in Australia.[2] In April 2021, Justice Perram awarded Apple a temporary three-month stay of proceedings on the basis of an exclusive foreign choice of court agreement in favour of the courts of the… [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
If Peter raises the First Amendment as a defense, he loses--even though Deirdre is invoking the power of the state (in the form of the judge) to obtain an order to Peter that he pay damages.Some readers at this point might be thinking: what about Shelley v. [read post]