Search for: "State v. Wood"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2023, 2:20 pm
In Stay You, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:58 am
That day is soon to come, as the Court considers United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
., Wood v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 3:36 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:28 am
Or it might not.The case is Manza v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm
I am still working on a comment on the substantive aspects of today's Supreme Court decision in Hall v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
See Broussard v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 10:05 pm
News13 reports that last Thursday, an officer of the state Fish and Wildlife Service found a coffin upside down in a wooded area near De Leon Springs (about half an hour west of Daytona Beach). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2009) - Judgment Andrew Wood was an activist involved in the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2009) - Judgment Andrew Wood was an activist involved in the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT). [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
The Court of Appeals holds that the police had the right to detain a driver and his passengers while they searched the car for contraband (finding nothing) even though there was no probable cause to detain these people.The case is United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:35 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
Daniel Byman analyzed the significance of the Trump administration’s decision on Tuesday to put North Korea back on the list of state sponsors of terrorism. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
In Ware v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 10:18 am
United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:30 pm
The decision to hear Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm
" Getting to the broadness of the Sawyer/Man claim, the Supreme Court stated: "But if woods generally were not adapted to the purpose, and yet the patentee had discovered a wood ossessing certain qualities, which gave it a peculiar fitness for such purpose, it would not constitute an infringement for another to discover and use a different kind of wood, which was found to contain similar or superior qualities. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:40 am
The court issued the order in the case of United Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
