Search for: "State v. York" Results 1021 - 1040 of 32,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 6:02 am
NO-FAULT – CLASS ACTION LITIGATION – CPLR 901 Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 Remember that if you are in a situation in which federal law is bad, argue that New York State's constitution is more protective of rights and make a state constitutional argument.The good news is that, as pointed out by Jamie Hobbs of the Monroe County Public Defender's Office, the current New York state case law is the opposite from the decision reached by the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
Authority of the New York City's Department of Investigation to compel an individual to comply with an "investigative subpoena"Matter of Parkhouse v Stringer, 2009 NY Slip Op 05205, decided on June 25, 2009, Court of AppealsVirginia Parkhouse's testimony at a public hearing before a New York City agency prompted a complaint by a public official, followed by a subpoena to Parkhouse from the New York City Department of Investigation (DOI). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Thomas
Perez United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Case No: 1:18-cv-0765 (PKC) Filed August 22, 2018, Decided February 05, 2019. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
In 2009, the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, issued an important decision in People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:09 am
Appeal Board) v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2010 NY Slip Op 01854, Decided on March 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn May 1991 Cynthia T. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
  They relied heavily on a 2006 decision by the state's highest court,  Hernandez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:59 pm
Last week, the Second Department in Matter of Laureiro v New York City Dept. of Consumer Affairs, 2007 NY Slip Op 05509 held that it could. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 11:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
National Collegiate Athletic Association A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal statute that prohibits modification or repeal of state-law prohibitions on private conduct impermissibly commandeers the regulatory power of states in contravention of New York v. [read post]