Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 4,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2020, 1:17 pm
In 2007, the Supreme Court decided eBay v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Kahler v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau last week built out this point, drawing on recent historical scholarship). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
There is the risk that elected governors will seek to protect the interests of the profession rather than the public interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:01 am
In 3M v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
Amanda Shanor analyzes Monday’s decision in Barr v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
In Barr v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
The case considered the constitutionality of a 2015 amendment to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am
” Greg Stohr reports at Bloomberg that “[t]he ruling is a defeat for political groups that had sought a new avenue for campaign activity in the months leading up to the November election. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:07 pm
American Association of Political Consultants, in which the Court invalidated a provision of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) exempting calls to collect on government debt from a broader prohibition on robocalls. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that the structure of the CFPB was unconstitutional as an independent agency, because Congress required the president to have good cause to remove its single director. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in which the court ruled that the structure of the CFPB, which is run by a single director who can only be removed for cause, is unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
From the inception of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), opponents have argued that its single-director structure is unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:15 am
Image: Takashi Hososhima - Flickr: Hey, what are you up to? [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
I hadn't even gone to law school yet, and I was in charge of setting it up. [read post]
