Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
Ed. 2d 117, 126 (1999); California v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
Because the Border Patrol Agents who stopped Valdes-Vega did not have the authority to enforce California traffic laws, Valdes-Vega’s violation of California traffic laws cannot form the sole basis for the vehicle stop. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
I hope you will take the time to read it. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:32 pm
Code, sections 65590, 65590.1) and the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Pub. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:29 am
Arenas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:12 am
There’s a limit to how much you can do that, though; overcrowding in California prisons led to last year’s Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
According to the federal lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:42 pm
Since it was handed down late last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm
Since it was handed down late last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
The introduction to Chief Justice Robert’s opinion (and the corresponding dissent) cite opinions that first year law students (and even high school students taking classes on American Government) would be familiar: Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
The introduction to Chief Justice Robert’s opinion (and the corresponding dissent) cite opinions that first year law students (and even high school students taking classes on American Government) would be familiar: Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am
California, 332 U.S. 46, 68 (1947) (Murphy, J. dissenting). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Despite the Supreme Court’s recent 8-1 decision in Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), which held that obscene material is not protected by the 1st Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:36 am
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Evans v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
