Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 21,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 6:23 am
Nonetheless, Home Depot allowed her to continue working and was ready to grant her request for time off to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, but about a month later, she tested positive for alcohol while on the job. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
Farmers Group examines the test in determining a worker’s independent contractor status. [read post]
25 May 2013, 3:41 pm
The lawyers for the plaintiffs put Mr. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
The district court, however, denied Plaintiff's motion seeking reconsideration of its constructive discharge ruling and Plaintiff filed a timely appeal in the U. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
The district court, however, denied Plaintiff's motion seeking reconsideration of its constructive discharge ruling and Plaintiff filed a timely appeal in the U. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
This, perhaps, provides some insight into the rationale for a California plaintiff to sue citizens of California and New York in an Indiana court. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:55 am
The plaintiff, a resident of Minnesota was offered employment in West Virginia by a Wisconsin-based employer. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
In fact, as part of her prayer for relief, the plaintiff in the suit specifically demanded that she be reassigned to work directly for me. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
The admitting diagnosis was pneumonia based upon a chest X-ray and blood test. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 12:34 pm
In this case, “generally” is an important qualification, because the court must take into consideration the fact that, in any mass production operation, defections or deviations are inevitable; 2) Whether IKO tested the tiles in accordance with the D228 procedure; 3) If IKO did not test in accordance with D228 procedure, whether it tested the tiles in a way that would verify compliance with the D228 procedure; 4) Whether any failure to satisfy the D225 standard… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:28 am
Plaintiff allegedly consumed a hot turkey sandwich during his break. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 8:52 am
Spying Program May Be Tested by Terror Case Lawyers for Mr. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:52 pm
For instance, if the report has important information about the incident and what caused it, the first part of the test can be fairly easy to establish. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:16 pm
These plaintiffs have sought a preliminary injunction against the Department’s new rule, found here, largely predicated on the original August 10 enforcement date. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:20 am
Basically, it told the testing entity to use a particular setting when testing all four types of carpets, in contradiction to what the user manual said and what the testers initially did. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:02 am
The following observation from a District Court in Louisiana hardly seems radical: Some injury or harm is a requisite element of the constitutional requirement that a plaintiff have standing to pursue a claim, and although courts differ in the test that they apply to measure standing in such cases, most assess, in at least some fashion, whether the plaintiff has suffered an injury or harm from a defendant’s alleged failure to comply with Title III of the ADA. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:31 pm
And that question, in turn, pivoted on the last factor in the test under section 6 of the Restatement (Second) Conflict of Laws -- "the relevant policies of the forum, the policies of other states and their relative interests in the determination of the particular issue, and the protection of justified expectations. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:56 pm
After the company’s spot test, the three plaintiffs began secretly weighing bags without the company’s knowledge. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 8:29 am
The panel then concluded that the district court applied the correct test in determining that the evidence could satisfy the proximate cause test with respect to five out of the six alleged price declines. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:38 pm
To satisfy § 291, the plaintiff must show interference-in-fact; part of that showing is the "two way test," which means that the second patent must be either anticipated by or obvious in light of the first patent. [read post]
