Search for: "U.S. v. Terry" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
” As expected, the proposal immediately came under fire by anti-copyright activist Michael Geist.[1] In criticizing the proposal he deployed the playbook that he uses to systematically oppose initiatives to protect creators of cultural materials;[2] namely, to deny there is any problem to be addressed, contend that even if there is problem the laws don’t need changing, and to engage in scaremongering[3], in this case, by claiming the proposal is “radical” and… [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
BACKGROUNDIn December 2006, Terry and Michael Mabry refinanced the loan on theirhome in Corona from Paul Financial, borrowing about $700,000. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Laurel Terry, Professor, Penn State Dickinson School of Law, The EU's Professional Services Competition Initiative: Is the EU Very Far Behind Australia and the UK With Respect to Publicly Traded Law Firms? [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
Alterman, Sue Mi Terry, William Alan Reinsch and Louis Lauter will be present. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am by Kara OBrien
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am by Kara OBrien
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]