Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 1021 - 1040
of 8,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
In this case, AT&T was able to protect its brand and maintain its Canadian trademark registration for GO PHONE for use in association with telecommunications services despite evidence that in order to access the services Canadian customers needed to purchase hardware, either an AT&T phone or a Sim card, in the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:00 am
It can’t tell courts how to decide cases (again, absent a change in the substantive law on which the case is based), see United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
Mandatory-minimum statutes generate some of the worst injustices in federal sentencing: a situation not helped by Judge Beezer's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
” Id. citing MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
” Id. citing MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Trinity Indus., Inc. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:47 am
Although defendants in customs penalty cases are entitled to a jury trial on whether or not they are liable for a violation, the amount of the penalty is not a question for the jury.So says the Court of International Trade in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:54 pm
… by the United States House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol …. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
After Teva Pharmaceuticals appealed the dismissal of its declaratory judgment action in District Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has taken a fresh new look at things in light of the Supreme Court's decision in MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:15 am
Mulligan V , Attorney On Friday August 10, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the claims filed by Rachel Krumpelbeck in a product liability suit against Breg, Inc., a manufacturer of pain pumps and other medical devices. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
On June 25, 2010, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office rendered its decision in the case of Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Marine Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Marine Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:47 pm
Marine Terminals, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
