Search for: "United States v. Container Corp" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Likewise, persons discharging dredged or fill material into the “waters of the United States” must obtain a permit from a state or the Corps. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
 Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is found in an increasing number of workplaces in the United States, in part reflecting larger restructuring of business organizations. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am by Kathy Kreps
United States Steel Corp., an Indiana court found a co-worker’s Confederate flag tattoo “was not sufficiently severe and pervasive to establish a hostile work environment. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Sokoloff v Harriman Estates Development Corp., supra. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
  If you are interested, you can find the Manual for Courts-Martial – United States, here. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In re GNC Corp., -- F.3d --, 2015 WL 3798174 (4thCir. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:05 am
He enlisted in the United States Marine Corps in 1986 and was discharged from active duty in 1990. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm by Schachtman
Gasoline contains small amounts of benzene, on the order of 1 percent or less. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
First up is Dollar General Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board acknowledged the ruling in Imperial Holmes Corp v Lamont (1972) on the application of section 101 to architectural drawings. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Writing for a unanimous court in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]