Search for: "United States v. Li"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2009, 5:49 am
January 5, 2009),* relying on United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:17 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964), the United States Supreme Court has found that the First Amendment limits the circumstances under which a speaker or publisher may be punished for making false and defamatory statements: "Neither lies nor false communications serve the ends of the First Amendment . . . [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
The motion was based on a defense contention that the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution foreclosed application of the recently enacted statute repealing the corroboration rules that would otherwise have governed the trial on those counts. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
Elsewhere, in the United Kingdom, for instance, a period of five years is and was relevant. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
Ellis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:48 am
Indeed, an old 3d Circuit case, Donovan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 10:43 pm
(But maybe not.)Further, advocating for a constitutional convention can put on the table policy proposals that are quite utopian given existing constitutional arrangements -- most obviously, the equal representation of the states in the Senate, but probably also revision of our entire constitutional approach to campaign finance (not merely Citizens United, itself not an important decision and in my view well-supported by existing constitutional doctrine -- which is the real… [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States-18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:17 am
On 5 and 6 October 2020, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in the matter of Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:11 am
At issue is the Middle Claiborne Aquifer, which lies underneath both states. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am
Therein lies the rub. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 1:19 pm
In London Borough of Town Hamlets v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Warger v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
. . . .V. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
