Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2016, 4:01 am
August 16, 2016 - 2 PM: Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff In Royal Crown Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
August 16, 2016 - 2 PM: Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Justice Manson had suggested that the doctrine was not applicable in Canada, stating: Some United States Courts have held such use can cause “initial interest confusion”, where confusion is caused in the customer before actually purchasing a good or service, when the customer seeks a particular brand of goods or services, but is drawn or enticed to a competitor’s goods or services through the competitor’s use of the first company’s trade name… [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
§ 292) is constitutional under the “Appointments” and “Take Care” clauses of the United States Constitution (Article II, Sections 2 and 3). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:40 pm
Posted by Mark D. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:18 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Nyazee, The Probable Islamic State of the Future, (October 21, 2023).Mark Satta, 303 Creative v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
Corp. v Huang, 94 AD2d 176, 180 [internal quotation marks omitted]).Accordingly, the AD2 reversed the underlying determination, and dismissed the causes of action in question.Was that a toothless agreement? [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:29 pm
” United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
This from the folks at the University of Iowa: CALL FOR PAPERS: For a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 2:44 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
California Fish Co., 138 P. 79 (Cal. 1913); Marks v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
