Search for: "United States v. Murphy"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
The rule does not apply to individuals who have previously been denied asylum in one or more countries through which they traveled prior to arrival in the United States, victims of human trafficking, or individuals who have only passed through nations that have not signed international treaties on refugee protection. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:55 am
In Apex Oil Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:19 pm
"] From Gruber v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
http://tinyurl.com/47udhb6 (Philip Gordon) Davis v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am
Importantly, the Report is the only publication of its kind in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
Even though Massachusetts is the 49th state to adopt the UTSA, MUTSA differs from other states’ versions of the UTSA. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
Francis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 1996) ("The nonobviousness of the accused device, evidenced by the grant of a United States patent, is relevant to the issue of whether the change therein is substantial. [read post]
