Search for: "Waters v. United States"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 4,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm
Tide Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Class II Gaming)United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act - Class II Gaming)United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:49 pm
City of Healdsburg, 496 F.3d 993, 999-1000 (9th Cir.2007) (" River Watch II");FN12 United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
United States, No. 2011-5001 (Fed. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm
Well, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed the District Court’s well-crafted opinion in Tibble v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
This case is the logical follow-on to another Rivers and Harbors case, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:52 am
Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that the Lyubarskys actively concealed mold and water damage in the unit’s balcony, and assigned storage unit and parking space, and additionally concealed defective conditions throughout the common areas of the building. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 7:53 am
Here is the abstract: As headlines over the last decade have made clear, people in the United States can no longer afford to take fresh water for granted. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
Woodlock of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. . . . [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm
Because the upgrade involves discharging fill material into the waters of the United States, which is prohibited under the Clean Water Act (CWA) without a permit, PSE sought verification from the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency (March 21, 2012) the Supremes held that the Clean Water Act is subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires an appeals process for any ruling by a federal agency. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:27 pm
Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:42 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
United States, holds Apprendi v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:13 pm
IBWA is a nonprofit whose members are bottled water producers, distributors, and suppliers in the United States and abroad. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
