Search for: "White v. Director" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 7:31 am by Joy Waltemath
Although she presented a prima facie case of racial discrimination, she was unable to demonstrate that PHA’s facially legitimate reasons for its hiring decision—that the position required a graduate degree, which she did not possess—were pretextual (Grdinich v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm by Anita Earls
Anita Earls is the executive director of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hawaii v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:46 am by Rachel Bercovitz
On Wednesday, Trump met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lawfare liveblogged both yesterday’s oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:44 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is hearing oral arguments at 2:30pm today in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
This meant that, even if the White House could keep the Senate in line in the meantime, they would almost surely lose the Senate halfway through Clinton’s first term.What no one saw coming was the speed with which things turned against Clinton. [read post]