Search for: "1-16 Does" Results 1041 - 1060 of 19,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 10:30 am by Unknown
," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Latest Articles, 18 Jan. 2022 [free full-text]Multimedia:Quo Vadis Refugee Protection in the EU: legal obligations and their shortcomings, 16 Dec. 2021 [access]Related posts:- Regional Focus: Europe - Pt. 1 (15 Jan. 2022)- Regional Focus: Europe - Pt. 2 (15 Jan. 2022) [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:07 pm
  Which wouldn't be all that terrible, but for the fact that the video also shows him drinking "an additional six mixed drinks, including four between 1:21 p.m. and 3:05 p.m., one at 4:16 p.m., and one at 6:06 p.m. . . . [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
How does solidarity contribute to the effective realisation of public goods? [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:24 am
Effective November 1, 2013, the law is amended as follows: 1. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Just because in most reverse micelle systems the active ingredient is packaged into the interior of the micelle does not make it unclear that Appellant desires to do just the opposite.We reverse the rejection of claims 1, 4-8, 15, 16, 19, 20, 23-25, and 27-33 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 9:15 am by EEM
Workshop: Forced Migration Research Network Research and Strategy Workshop, Sydney, 16 August 2016 [info]Publications:Australia: Why Stopping the Boats does not Solve the Problem – Part 1 (Jesuit Refugee Service, July 2016) [text]Closing the Country: Where to Next for Australia’s Asylum Seekers? [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Zones, col. 1 ll. 55–56,col. 8 ll. 16–17. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
As a result, expanding survivor benefits does not provide an avenue for the federal government to revoke the State’s reverse offset status. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 2:13 am by Neil Wilkof
The first question seeks to distinguish this case from C-265/16 VCAST/RTI (Katpost here) and the second question from C-527/15 Stichting Brein (Filmspeler) (Katpost here). [read post]