Search for: "AT&T Mobility, LLC" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  The court rejected the plaintiffs’ attempt to create a “vindication of federal statutory rights” exception to the landmark ruling inAT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Jared Klaus
The Italian Colors decision comes on the heels of the Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:08 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In the end, the AmEx majority found that its decision in its seminal class-waiver decision, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 1:14 pm
  The Second Circuit sua sponte reconsidered its ruling in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Court lastly considered YouTube's syndication agreements under which Apple, Sony, Panasonic, TiVo and AT&T users were able to obtain YouTube content on their mobile devices. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 11:51 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Many, including Oxford Health who relied on Stolt-Nielsen heavily in its briefing, read Stolt-Nielsen as the curtain closing on class-wide arbitrations, but Sutter (and AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Keeping a Pulse on Class and Collective Actions: An Analysis of Recent Supreme Court and Federal Court Decisions Involving FRCP Rule 23 and the FLSA The panel will discuss recent, key decisions involving 1) AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
  The question before the Court in Sanchez is as follows:  Does the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. section 2), as interpreted in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:14 am by Jon Hyman
Spitzer, the “don’t have your lawyer investigate” case — from Warren & Associates BlogSocial Media & Workplace Technology The Latest Social Media Concern for Employers — from WSJ.com Can an LLC member violate the Stored Communications Act by accessing other members’ email? [read post]