Search for: "Ball v. Ball" Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2017, 11:56 am by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton
In employment and labor attorney Scott Connolly‘s new article “Firing Executives for Cause: Recent Case Offers Lessons“, Scott discusses how the outcome of Eric Balles v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:08 pm by Amanda Proctor
The South Carolina Supreme Court recently took a firm stance on what constitutes a sufficient reservation of rights letter in Harleysville Group Insurance v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:37 am by SHG
And then there is the non-textual decision, such as the Supreme Court’s Graham v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Heather Gray-Grant
It’s different working with an extrovert v. an introvert. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Stephan Haggard
First, it is clear that the Trump administration is not receptive to the core of the Chinese proposal for an interim freeze proposal as a way to get the diplomatic ball rolling. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:56 am by Matthias Weller
Stefan Huber, Hannover, took up the ball and presented on current developments of comparative legal research and methodology in general as well as possible particularities of comparing procedural law such as e.g. a strong lex fori-principle, the supplementing character of procedural law supporting the realization of private rights, a typically compact character of a procedural legal system, areas of discretion for the judge and the central role of the state – features which might make… [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
IP Ball Location: De Vere Grand Connaught Rooms, Holborn, LondonTime: Saturday 15th JulyTo whom: All IP professionals are welcomed.The Facebook event page can be found here.Photo courtesy of Ms. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ginsburg borrowed from her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
 But you could definitely allow this discovery, in my view, if you wanted to.Judging -- with all due respect to Chief Justice Roberts -- isn't just about calling balls and strikes. [read post]