Search for: "Call v. Superior Court"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 4,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Superior Court (1971) 4 Cal.3d 545, 551, fn. 2 (Santa Clara) [Courts of Appeal “erred in reasoning that the limitation, because mandatory, was necessarily jurisdictional. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:05 pm
” See K.E.M. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:27 am
In the case of DiCarlo v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:46 am
See Barker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:27 pm
In the event the FTB denied his refund claim, he could still obtain relief by suing for a refund in California Superior Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:02 am
District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Craig Iscoe replaced the murder conviction with one for manslaughter. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 8:21 pm
In addition to the cases cited above on the topic at hand, this decision should be compared with the Delaware Superior Court’s Infomedia decision that was issued just a few short weeks before this Chancery ruling. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:23 am
These are called “categorical takings,” and the leading case is Lucas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:31 am
The commission found that in one case, City of Moreno Valley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
About two and a half years ago, I wrote about the Maricopa County Superior Court running out of judges to preside over a client’s trial. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in the case of Mallory v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
The court turned to State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:26 am
In the recent case of Leimeister v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Sandpiper Real Estate Fund 4 Limited Partnership v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
A superior court judge ruled for the State. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
A superior court judge ruled for the State. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 6:48 am
(Suffolk Superior Court) (Civil Action No. 2384CV02766-BLS2) (July 16, 2024). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 8:16 pm
The state demonstrated that the superior court deviated from its accepted and usual practice of judicial proceedings calling for availability of review. [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:11 pm
By Kyle Burgis The Ontario Superior Court of Justice found yet another termination clause to be invalid and unenforceable. [read post]
