Search for: "Cook v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Whiting v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:59 am
Cowles v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:38 pm
The CDC reports that mortality rates from Clostridium difficile disease in the United States increased from 5.7 per million population in 1999 to 23.7 per million in 2004. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), which I’ve discussed in prior posts.In Kyllo, federal agents who suspected Danny Lee Kyllo was growing marijuana in hishome in a triplex, . . . used a thermal-imaging device to scan the triplex to determine if the amount of heat emanating from it was consistent with the high-intensity lamps typically used for indoor marijuana growth. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
United States, U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
” Back in 1999, in Bernstein v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
The PSC argues that the cost of translation should be considered reasonable cost of doing business in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:46 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Cook Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington 08a0087n.06 Maloof v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
This is consistent with the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
* State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 5:29 am
ZTE guidance after the Federal Court of Justice of Germany vitiated the ECJ case law in two Sisvel v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
By contrast, in Oracle v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
WEINSTEIN, PINSON & RILEY, P.S., EVAN MOSCOV, and EGS FINANCIAL CARE, INC., formerly known as NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.No. 14 C 739.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
12 May 2017, 8:00 am
United States of America, No. 16-2109, U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
But just days after the California Supreme Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants, in Robert Martinez et al., v. [read post]
