Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2017, 9:17 pm
Shaw, Third-party funding in investment arbitration: how non-disclosure can cause harm for the sake of profit Fan Yang, The proper law of the arbitration agreement: Mainland Chinese and English law compared Case NotesBlake Primrose, Separability and stage one of the Sulamérica inquiry Francisco González de Cossío, Mexico’s fantastic three: a pro-arbitration trilogy Kwadwo Sarkodie & Joseph Otoo, Getma v Republic of Guinea—implications for… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
from: www.fromrussia.com Where licensee had licensed “Russian language only” or “English language only” rights to distribute Russian language films in the United States, could the licensor claim copyright infringements over production of DVDs with multilingual functionality? [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:41 pm
Last week, in Woods v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
(Webcast of full hearing with English simultaneous translation.) [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:15 am
In Papavasilakis v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
v=FJNOkLCIg5Y Get bonus content on Patreon See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:05 pm
New SCOTUS nominee, Judge Kavanaugh, addressed this issue in a concurring opinion in Ayissi-Etoh v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Ratification was advised by the Senate of the United States of America on June 21, 1976. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:14 am
English Absract: This paper, presented at the Bi-annual Meeting of the German Society of International Law in Lucerne, sets out the law on the immunity of State officials. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:11 am
United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:03 am
Plain English Issue: Does the government violate a federal contract employee’s constitutional right to privacy by asking her whether she has received counseling or treatment for recent illegal drug use in the past year, or by asking her references if they have any reason to believe she is unsuited to work in a federal facility? [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
There is a short English phrase – not suitable for print – but featuring the word “cake” that sums this principle up nicely. [1] When reading this point, the authors were reminded of the decision of Vos J in Fresenius v Carefusion [2011] EWHC 2969 in which it was held that if a patentee consented to the revocation of its patent, it was not appropriate for it to be compelled to… [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:44 am
It also confirms the English court’s creditor-friendly reputation. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:46 am
Further, UoI stated that for the English courts to assume jurisdiction, the place of arbitration was a relevant factor. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The defendant will claim the onus is on the plaintiff, who lives in the United States, filed a claim in the United States and intends to testify, presumably in English or through her own translator, at the eventual trial. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 3:05 am
The court stated verbatim the following: It is true that both the English court and the Judge issuing the orders did not issue anti-suit injunctions. [read post]
