Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
A Lawsuit Seeking The Transfer Of Title In Real Property Is Only In County Where Property Is Located
10 Dec 2009, 1:13 pm
English v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 10:52 am
English v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1614, 1618 (2022) (Barrett, J.); United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:10 am
The judgment (DiCaprio v Oops!) [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
The case -- Alexander v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
for participation, by an act occurred in another Member State (Member State B), in violation of trade mark rights committed in the first Member State (Member State A )? [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:24 am
Case Citation: Will Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:00 pm
When English fails, Yiddish may come to the rescue. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
Leandra English v Trump et Mulvaney Non-news in lieu of Big News: Oral arguments heard 12/22, English bid for preliminary injunction taken under advisement. - Docket with Amici Roster and List of AttorneysLeandra-English-v-Mulvaney-and-President-Trump-CFPB-Leadership-Fight 12/27/17NCSLT is an original creditor? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, the court in Capps v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, the court in Capps v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Today we revisit the case of the day from October 28, 2011, Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
We have translated patent law, trademark law, and related IP law concepts into plain English. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
She then decided to bring a claim for financial relief under English law on the basis that she had purchased a property in England in 2014 and, since 2017, had been living in England permanently. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Professor Douglas Edlin of Dickinson College convincingly argues that two forms of judicial review existed at the time Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
