Search for: "Fed Ex"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2013, 12:37 pm
Ex parte BIENIOSEK As to 112 rejections:Rejection under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
”Ex parte Levy, 17 USPQ2d1461, 1464 (BPAI 1990). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:17 pm
VeriSign, Inc.,545 F.3d 1359, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:11 pm
Ex parte Taylor **As to teaching awayThis argument is not persuasive. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:24 am
Numerous questions surround the SEC’s new policy requiring enforcement action defendants in “egregious” cases to admit to wrongdoing in order to settle with the agency, rather than simply agreeing to neither admit nor deny the agency’s allegations. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 10:27 am
See In re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349,1357 (Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:05 am
Ex parte DAVID G. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:02 am
See In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1478 (Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:55 am
See In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091,1097 (Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
Ex parte NOBUHIRO YABUNOUCHIDillon is cited in an obviousness type double-patenting case:We are not persuaded by Appellants’ argument. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:37 am
Seibert, Inc., 512 F.3d 1338, 1344 (Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
., Wachtel ex rel. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
., Wachtel ex rel. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 8:39 am
His ex-wife, Robin Miller, asked a judge for the declaration after Miller went missing so that her daughters could receive Social Security benefits. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 5:21 am
§ 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (second sentence); see also In re Hyatt, 211 F.3d 1367, 1373 (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
We wonder how much fun the feds had in their negotiations with the whistleblowers in the qui tam case of U.S. ex. rel. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
., 467 F.3d 1355, 1364- 65 (Fed. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:11 am
Milgraum, 192 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:02 am
Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1563 (Fed. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:47 am
See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1073 (Fed. [read post]