Search for: "Grace v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
They include, but are not limited to the following:"Creators, rightholders, intermediaries, users, copyright law and state or quasi state institutions form a complex feedback system in which technological change is a factor. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
(For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am by SHG
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Destiny Washington, FordHarrison
However, the Department of Labor (DOL) has endorsed the following nonexhaustive, seven-factor “Primary Beneficiary Test,” which was established by the 2nd Circuit in Glatt v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:23 am by admin
  Not sailed so much as blown and drifting   The case is Fane Lozman v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
  Our Chief Justice was making (v. earning) $107,600 per annum and will now be paid $128,556. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
  A graceful exit: redefining terminal to expand the availability of physician-facilitated suicide. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Lawcast 203:  Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London  who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]