Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 68,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The court ruled that the law does not grant the body the authority to obtain the land, thus deeming the acquisition illegal. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
In In Re Jackson, Judge Leval applied this approach to a right of publicity claim, but it is applicable to any state law cause of action, and in X v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
   Conversely, in the second 10x Genomics v NanoString decision issued in Munich, the Court considered itself to have jurisdiction to decide a PI application for an EP despite infringement and revocation proceedings having been brought in German national courts under the German designation of the EP, which had resulted in an injunction being granted to 10x Genomics. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:15 am by Zachary Stolz
We are going to briefly examine each of […] The post Veterans v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The trial court granted summary judgment on this claim in favor of the State, but the Court of Appeals brings the case back, and unless the case settles, it looks like this case will proceed to trial.The case is Brandon v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 8:49 am by Steven Cohen
Summary: Construction Expert Witness testimony excluded because the court ruled that the expert cannot state that the Chinese drywall caused the plaintiffs’ injuries Facts: This case (Fozard et al v. [read post]