Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 6:07 am by Florian Mueller
Also, it's important to keep in mind that this dispute has become increasingly acrimonious.On Monday Skyhook brought a "motion to compel Google Inc. to produce Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfLast week's oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
The defendant disagreed and argued that EPO decision could not have res judicata over a French court.The defendant invoked various grounds, the main ground being that an EPO decision originates from an administrative authority in charge of granting patents and not a court of justice handing down binding judgments. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:15 pm
trading cards - the logo appears in the bottom right-hand corner of trading cards. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:25 am by gmlevine
Original Web Ventures Inc., D2006-1381 (WIPO March 5, 2007) (however, a strong dissent that puts this proposition in perspective), “this inference can only be drawn where it is shown that the mark was widely used when the Domain Name was registered. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm by News Desk
However, the FDA did not find the response adequate because Florida Key West Inc. is relying on foreign suppliers to take care of food safety issues. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Terratech inc. et SNC-Lavalin Environnement inc.) c. [read post]
28 May 2008, 8:03 pm
The figures don't include claims filed in state courts and smaller disputes involving a single loan or a handful of mortgages. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2004) (alteration in original) (quoting In re Bond, 910 F.2d 831, 833 (Fed. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
     Flashpoint’s complaint originally named Respondents Nokia Corp. and Nokia, Inc.; Research in Motion Ltd. and Research in Motion Corp.; HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.; LG Electronics, Inc., LG Twin Towers, LG Electronics USA, Inc. and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Where the original application once embraced the purported equivalent but the patentee narrowed his claims to obtain the patent or to protect its validity, the patentee cannot assert that he lacked the words to describe the subject matter in question. [read post]