Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am by Anna Christensen
United States, the Court asked the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in the context of United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:33 am by Derek Chaiken
A recent unpublished case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit shed light on which parties have the right to make a claim or sue on a commercial insurance policy. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On June 21, in one of its last decisions of the term, Holder v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Jon Sands
Holder, 697 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome: This appeal is from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas that, on remand from this court, granted-in-part Morris & Associates, Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
"  Defendant Shasta Technologies appealed from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granting LifeScan Scotland a preliminary injunction. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:06 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Byron has lived in the United States for nearly three decades and started several successful small businesses. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 10:43 am by Scott Bomboy
In the United States, voters do not select presidential candidates directly. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 11:18 am by David S. Jones
   The H-2B non-agricultural temporary worker program allows U.S. employers to bring foreign nationals to the United States to fill temporary non-agricultural jobs. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"After rejecting the State's arguments, Judge Debevoise suggested that the State reconcile the Truth in Music Act with the Lanham Act by interpreting subsection (e) of the former to permit unregistered trademark holders to perform under their group names without any additional requirements. [read post]