Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
This is the first judicial takings case for the Court, though former Justice Potter Stewart referred to the concept in his concurrence in Hughes v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm by Adam Wagner
Simon Hughes’ comments certainly suggest that change is imminent. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Both the federal and state constitutions guarantee equal protection to all persons although the New York Equal Protection Clause is no broader in coverage than the Federal provision as held in Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:16 am by Cannabis Law Group
This is true despite the fact that data overwhelmingly shows there is very little variation in the percentage of whites v. blacks who use the drug. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am by Anthony Fairclough
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
30 May 2009, 4:16 am
Hugh Carey that "capital punishment represents ongoing racism within our society. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:32 am by Michelle Yeary
  Here the court relied on the FDCA’s express preemption provision and rejected plaintiff’s reliance on Hughes v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Baker Hughes, Inc., 215 F.3d 1297, 1301 (Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am by James Romoser
” At the Daily Wire, Denise Harle comments on FDA v. [read post]