Search for: "In Re Adoption of G."
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm
Depending upon the tone and substance of the comments, the SEC may move quickly to adopt the rules as proposed, adopt the rules with certain modifications based on the comments, or re-propose the rule for additional public comment. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:03 pm
Conversely, autoclaving mature compost and re-introducing human pathogens allows for pathogen survival and increase. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
All of Popehat's Prenda coverage is collected here. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:52 am
The positions they adopted arose from a common mistake. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm
Donnelly in 1984, narrowly adopted by the Court when she was the fifth vote in Allegheny in 1989. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
If you’re wondering why Google is pushing this issue so hard, one reason might be the size of the possible damages award. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
If you’re wondering why Google is pushing this issue so hard, one reason might be the size of the possible damages award. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
In response to the perceived threat presented by selective disclosure of material nonpublic information, by issuers, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted Regulation Fair Disclosure (“Regulation FD”) in 2000. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:08 pm
Going dark, of course, poses its own major problem: Section 312(g) of the Communications Act says that a broadcast station that fails to operate for 12 consecutive months automatically loses its license.While a number of LPTV representatives asked the Commission to re-think the December 31, 2011 deadline, the Commission has now concluded that no such re-think is necessary. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
”); In re W.R. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm
They’re meant to encourage rigour. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
In re Adoption of Alexander M.S.F. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm
(see Re H-L (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 655 para 3] Or, if you find you respond better to jaunty mantras; as the President says ‘ If in doubt, do without! [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Even if you’re confident that the FCC has the correct contact information for your operation, it wouldn’t hurt to check, just to be sure. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
., by upholding agency action based on, and by purporting to “defer” to, an interpretation of the Clean Air Act that the EPA itself not only never adopted – but in fact expressly rejected. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
George G. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
Interestingly, she links to a 1997 memo that recommended FDA re-examine its 60-day aging process for hard cheeses made from raw milk. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
(s10(4)) The listed “malware” and “spyware” functions include any of the following functions that the person who seeks express consent knows and intends will cause the computer system to operate in a manner that is contrary to the reasonable expectations of the owner or an authorized user of the computer system: (a) collecting personal information stored on the computer system; (b) interfering with the owner’s or an authorized user’s control of the computer… [read post]
