Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of The Lawfare Podcast in which Jack Goldsmith sat down with Richard Hanania to discuss the differences between public choice theory and American grand strategy in explaining U.S. foreign policy outcomes. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
” An all-Lawfare panel featuring Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic, Jack Goldsmith and David Priess discussed what happens when a president is incapacitated. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 5:45 am
Jack Goldsmith evaluated the role the Presidential Records Act plays in arguments about the presidential records retrieved by the FBI in their search at Mar-a-Lago. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
And Ben and Jack Goldsmith invited us to this coming Monday’s Hoover Book Soiree, featuring an interview with Jameel Jaffer on his book The Drone Memos: Targeted Killing, Secrecy, and the Law. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
At Lawfare, Jack Goldsmith (no relation to Jack Smith) and Tom Koenig offer a wonky breakdown of the Court's order. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 11:04 am
??????? [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
Goldsmith. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
Art Carney over Jack Nicholson, Al Pacino, and Dustin Hoffman?!!!). [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
A useful place to start is a recent essay by University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer and an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Mearsheimer sat down for a conversation with Lawfare co-founder Jack Goldsmith. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
As Jack Goldsmith has rightly argued: [T]he Obama draft AUMF does not restrain the President. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:26 am
”Both Kleinerman’s and Kennedy’s conceptions can be found in Jack Goldsmith’s account of law in the Bush Administration, making The Terror Presidency a more ambiguous account than I had previously thought. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:14 am
Jack Snyder and Leslie Vinjamuri, “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice,” International Security, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Winter 2003/04), pp. 5–44, doi.org/10.1162/016228803773100066; Jack Goldsmith, “The Self-Defeating International Criminal Court,” University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 1 (2003), pp. 89–104, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol70/iss1/7; Jack… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:40 pm
Eric quotes Jack Goldsmith as having written that the "revelations by Risen and Lichtblau had alerted our enemies, put our citizens at risk, and done ‘great harm' to the nation. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 11:18 am
Benjamin Wittes and Jack Goldsmith encouraged readers to attend the next Hoover Book soiree, wherein Jack interviews Mark Moyar, the author of a book on the rise of U.S. special forces. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
Ben gave his preliminary comments on the document and Jack Goldsmith also provided two reflections, partially, but not completely, agreeing with Ben. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am
Jack Goldsmith and Ben introduced Lawfare’s new subsidiary page called Aegis: Security Policy in Depth, a page designed to explore legal and policy issues at the intersection of technology, national security, and law. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:25 am
For example, Jack Goldsmith describes in The Terror Presidency that after 9-11,senior lawyers from DoD, OLC, the White House Counsel’s Office, and the Vice President’s Office created an informal “War Council” that excluded lawyers from the State Department, CIA, NSC, and JCS. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:17 am
” Lawfare’s own Jack Goldsmith similarly raised the issue of Congressional authorization when he asked whether the Orlando attack would “be the event that finally sparks Congress to authorize force—officially and expressly—against ISIS? [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:22 am
Jack Goldsmith launched Lawfare’s coverage when he asked whether anyone in the U.S. government is delegated the responsibility of protecting the integrity of our electoral system from cyberespionage. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:00 pm
Jack Goldsmith runs through much of this evolution in the detention context here, and Dawn notes in her essay that the most problematic Justice Department memos were withdrawn during the Bush years by Bush lawyers. [read post]
