Search for: "Knight v. Knight" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 12:56 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 26911 (D CO, March 3, 2011), a Colorado federal district court allowed an inmate to proceed against some defendants named in the suit on his complaint that he was not allowed to mail out religious study guides, and that despite his switch from Christianity to the Muslim faith he is being forced to eat non-kosher meals and was not [sic.] removed from the Ramadan list.In Knight v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am by James Coppess
Knight, Janus confirms that the First Amendment is not violated by collective bargaining through an exclusive employee representative. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:04 am
Number   Mark  Click to View1 4289474 BRINGING SAFETY TO PEOPLE View2 4294335 VINO VAN GOGH View3 4296699 CHICAGO BLUE View4 4295760 TOP SELECTS View5 4295717 GENTLEMAN'S RULE View6 4295564 SCEPTERMAX View7 4295456 ·MARIAN UNIVERSITY · KNIGHTS MU View8 4295450 ARTZY GIRLZ View9 4295233 FIBERGLASS FREAKS View10 4295158 SPECIALIZED TRUST STRATEGY (STS) View11 4295130 EXACTTARGET View12 4295092 SECLEAR ALGAECIDE AND WATER QUALITY ENHANCER View13… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
If we read the cases that build this new commercial speech doctrine, cases like Virginia Pharmacy and IMS v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
On Friday, we will be in court with our co-counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute and the law firm Cooley LLP for oral argument in the case, Wikimedia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:30 am
 Anglian Windows Ltd v Anglian Roofline Ltd is an end-of-October ruling of Judge Richard Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales which deals in a routine, run-of-the-mill manner with a routine-run-of-the-mill issue: the availability of interim injunctive relief to an established business against a trader introducing a new and arguably confusingly similar business name into the established business's market.In this dispute (so far noted only on… [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 12:30 pm
” This legal principle, articulated most clearly in the 2001 Supreme Court decision Bartnicki v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
In SEC v Capital Gains Research Bureau the US Supreme Court said a pump and dump scheme by an investment adviser violated its fiduciary duty. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Thaya Knight and Ilya Shapiro discuss the amicus brief that Cato filed recently in next Term’s insider trading case, Salman v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 12:31 pm by Andrew Vey
Knights of Columbus, 2022 ONSC 3788 at para. 19; see also Goberdhan v. [read post]